Causal Reasoning: Initial Report of a Naturalistic Study of Causal Inferences
نویسنده
چکیده
Motivation – This paper describes the initial results of a naturalistic inquiry into the way people derive causal inferences. Research approach – We examined media accounts of economic, political, military, and sports incidents to determine the types of causal explanations that are commonly invoked. Findings – We found two interacting processes at work: the identification of potential causes and the framing of these causes into explanations. Explanations took several forms: abstractions, events, lists (undifferentiated collections of partial causes), conditions, and stories (complex mechanisms linking several causes). Originality – Causal reasoning in "the real world" is both different from and far richer than the formal causal accounts found in philosophy, and from the determinate search for causes during scientific problem solving. Takeaway message – By understanding the way causal reasoning is done in natural settings we should be better able to help decision makers diagnose problems and anticipate consequences.
منابع مشابه
Uncertainty in Causal and Counterfactual Inference
We report 4 studies which show that there are systematic quantitative patterns in the way we reason with uncertainty during causal and counterfactual inference. Two specific type of uncertainty uncertainty about facts and about causal relations are explored, and used to model peoples causal inferences (Studies 1-3). We then consider the relationship between causal and counterfactual reason...
متن کاملPreferred Inferences in Causal Relational Reasoning: Counting Model Operations
Interpreting causal relations plays an important role in everyday life, for example in scientific inquiries and text comprehension. Errors in causal reasoning can be a recipe for disaster. Despite vast literature on the psychology of human causal reasoning, there are few investigations into preferred inferences in relational three-term problems. Based on a previous formal investigation about re...
متن کاملProblems Related to Causal Reasoning in Equilibrium Models
Causal discovery, for the most part, is concerned with learning causal models in the form of directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) from equilibrium (as opposed to time series) data. Causal reasoning, by contrast, is concerned with using such causal DAGs to perform inferences. In particular, much work on causal reasoning has focused on the ability to predict the new probability distribution over a set ...
متن کاملOn Cognitive Models of Causal Inferences and Causation Networks
Human thought, perception, reasoning, and problem solving are highly dependent on causal inferences. This paper presents a set of cognitive models for causation analyses and causal inferences. The taxonomy and mathematical models of causations are created. The framework and properties of causal inferences are elaborated. Methodologies for uncertain causal inferences are discussed. The theoretic...
متن کاملAssociative and causal reasoning accounts of causal induction: symmetries and asymmetries in predictive and diagnostic inferences.
Associative and causal reasoning accounts are probably the two most influential types of accounts of causal reasoning processes. Only causal reasoning accounts predict certain asymmetries between predictive (i.e., reasoning from causes to effects) and diagnostic (i.e., reasoning from effects to causes) inferences regarding cue-interaction phenomena (e.g., the overshadowing effect). In the exper...
متن کامل